Descriptive and inferential statistics are two broad categories in the field of statistics. In this blog post, I show you how both types of statistics are important for different purposes. Interestingly, some of the statistical measures are similar, but the goals and methodologies are very different.
Use descriptive statistics to summarize and graph the data for a group that you choose. This process allows you to understand that specific set of observations.
Descriptive statistics describe a sample. That’s pretty straightforward. You simply take a group that you’re interested in, record data about the group members, and then use summary statistics and graphs to present the group properties. With descriptive statistics, there is no uncertainty because you are describing only the people or items that you actually measure. You’re not trying to infer properties about a larger population.
The process involves taking a potentially large number of data points in the sample and reducing them down to a few meaningful summary values and graphs. This procedure allows us to gain more insights and visualize the data than simply pouring through row upon row of raw numbers!
Common tools of descriptive statistics
Descriptive statistics frequently use the following statistical measures to describe groups:
Dispersion: How far out from the center do the data extend? You can use the range or standard deviation to measure the dispersion. A low dispersion indicates that the values cluster more tightly around the center. Higher dispersion signifies that data points fall further away from the center. We can also graph the frequency distribution.
Skewness: The measure tells you whether the distribution of values is symmetric or skewed.
You can present this summary information using both numbers and graphs. These are the standard descriptive statistics, but there are other descriptive analyses you can perform, such as assessing the relationships of paired data using correlation and scatterplots.
Example of descriptive statistics
Suppose we want to describe the test scores in a specific class of 30 students. We record all of the test scores and calculate the summary statistics and produce graphs. Here is the CSV data file: Descriptive_statistics.
|Range||66.21 – 96.53|
|Proportion >= 70||86.7%|
These results indicate that the mean score of this class is 79.18. The scores range from 66.21 to 96.53, and the distribution is symmetrically centered around the mean. A score of at least 70 on the test is acceptable. The data show that 86.7% of the students have acceptable scores.
Collectively, this information gives us a pretty good picture of this specific class. There is no uncertainty surrounding these statistics because we gathered the scores for everyone in the class. However, we can’t take these results and extrapolate to a larger population of students.
We’ll do that later.
Inferential statistics takes data from a sample and makes inferences about the larger population from which the sample was drawn. Because the goal of inferential statistics is to draw conclusions from a sample and generalize them to a population, we need to have confidence that our sample accurately reflects the population. This requirement affects our process. At a broad level, we must do the following:
- Define the population we are studying.
- Draw a representative sample from that population.
- Use analyses that incorporate the sampling error.
We don’t get to pick a convenient group. Instead, random sampling allows us to have confidence that the sample represents the population. This process is a primary method for obtaining samples that mirrors the population on average. Random sampling produces statistics, such as the mean, that do not tend to be too high or too low. Using a random sample, we can generalize from the sample to the broader population. Unfortunately, gathering a truly random sample can be a complicated process.
Pros and cons of working with samples
You gain tremendous benefits by working with a random sample drawn from a population. In most cases, it is simply impossible to measure the entire population to understand its properties. The alternative is to gather a random sample and then use the methodologies of inferential statistics to analyze the sample data.
While samples are much more practical and less expensive to work with, there are tradeoffs. Typically, we learn about the population by drawing a relatively small sample from it. We are a very long way off from measuring all people or objects in that population. Consequently, when you estimate the properties of a population from a sample, the sample statistics are unlikely to equal the actual population value exactly.
For instance, your sample mean is unlikely to equal the population mean exactly. The difference between the sample statistic and the population value is the sampling error. Inferential statistics incorporate estimates of this error into the statistical results.
In contrast, summary values in descriptive statistics are straightforward. The average score in a specific class is a known value because we measured all individuals in that class. There is no uncertainty.
Related post: Sample Statistics Are Always Wrong (to Some Extent)!
Standard analysis tools of inferential statistics
The most common methodologies in inferential statistics are hypothesis tests, confidence intervals, and regression analysis. Interestingly, these inferential methods can produce similar summary values as descriptive statistics, such as the mean and standard deviation. However, as I’ll show you, we use them very differently when making inferences.
Hypothesis tests use sample data answer questions like the following:
- Is the population mean greater than or less than a particular value?
- Are the means of two or more populations different from each other?
For example, if we study the effectiveness of a new medication by comparing the outcomes in a treatment and control group, hypothesis tests can tell us whether the drug’s effect that we observe in the sample is likely to exist in the population. After all, we don’t want to use the medication if it is effective only in our specific sample. Instead, we need evidence that it’ll be useful in the entire population of patients. Hypothesis tests allow us to draw these types of conclusions about entire populations.
Related post: Statistical Hypothesis Testing Overview
Confidence intervals (CIs)
In inferential statistics, a primary goal is to estimate population parameters. These parameters are the unknown values for the entire population, such as the population mean and standard deviation. These parameter values are not only unknown but almost always unknowable. Typically, it’s impossible to measure an entire population. The sampling error I mentioned earlier produces uncertainty, or a margin of error, around our estimates.
Suppose we define our population as all high school basketball players. Then, we draw a random sample from this population and calculate the mean height of 181 cm. This sample estimate of 181 cm is the best estimate of the mean height of the population. However, it’s virtually guaranteed that our estimate of the population parameter is not exactly correct.
Confidence intervals incorporate the uncertainty and sample error to create a range of values the actual population value is like to fall within. For example, a confidence interval of [176 186] indicates that we can be confident that the real population mean falls within this range.
Related post: Understanding Confidence Intervals
Regression analysis describes the relationship between a set of independent variables and a dependent variable. This analysis incorporates hypothesis tests that help determine whether the relationships observed in the sample data actually exist in the population.
For example, the fitted line plot below displays the relationship in the regression model between height and weight in adolescent girls. Because the relationship is statistically significant, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that this relationship exists in the population rather than just our sample.
Related post: When Should I Use Regression Analysis?
Example of inferential statistics
For this example, suppose we conducted our study on test scores for a specific class as I detailed in the descriptive statistics section. Now we want to perform an inferential statistics study for that same test. Let’s assume it is a standardized statewide test. By using the same test, but now with the goal of drawing inferences about a population, I can show you how that changes the way we conduct the study and the results that we present.
In descriptive statistics, we picked the specific class that we wanted to describe and recorded all of the test scores for that class. Nice and simple. For inferential statistics, we need to define the population and then draw a random sample from that population.
Let’s define our population as 8th-grade students in public schools in the State of Pennsylvania in the United States. We need to devise a random sampling plan to help ensure a representative sample. This process can actually be arduous. For the sake of this example, assume that we are provided a list of names for the entire population and draw a random sample of 100 students from it and obtain their test scores. Note that these students will not be in one class, but from many different classes in different schools across the state.
Inferential statistics results
For inferential statistics, we can calculate the point estimate for the mean, standard deviation, and proportion for our random sample. However, it is staggeringly improbable that any of these point estimates are exactly correct, and there is no way to know for sure anyway. Because we can’t measure all subjects in this population, there is a margin of error around these statistics. Consequently, I’ll report the confidence intervals for the mean, standard deviation, and the proportion of satisfactory scores (>=70). Here is the CSV data file: Inferential_statistics.
|Statistic||Population Parameter Estimate (CIs)|
|Mean||77.4 – 80.9|
|Standard deviation||7.7 – 10.1|
|Proportion scores >= 70||77% – 92%|
Given the uncertainty associated with these estimates, we can be 95% confident that the population mean is between 77.4 and 80.9. The population standard deviation (a measure of dispersion) is likely to fall between 7.7 and 10.1. And, the population proportion of satisfactory scores is expected to be between 77% and 92%.
Differences between Descriptive and Inferential Statistics
As you can see, the difference between descriptive and inferential statistics lies in the process as much as it does the statistics that you report.
For descriptive statistics, we choose a group that we want to describe and then measure all subjects in that group. The statistical summary describes this group with complete certainty (outside of measurement error).
For inferential statistics, we need to define the population and then devise a sampling plan that produces a representative sample. The statistical results incorporate the uncertainty that is inherent in using a sample to understand an entire population.
A study using descriptive statistics is simpler to perform. However, if you need evidence that an effect or relationship between variables exists in an entire population rather than only your sample, you need to use inferential statistics.