• Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Store
  • Glossary
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Statistics By Jim

Making statistics intuitive

  • Graphs
  • Basics
  • Hypothesis Testing
  • Regression
  • ANOVA
  • Probability
  • Time Series
  • Fun

Cronbach’s Alpha: Definition, Calculations & Example

By Jim Frost 4 Comments

What is Cronbach’s Alpha?

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient measures the internal consistency, or reliability, of a set of survey items. Use this statistic to help determine whether a collection of items consistently measures the same characteristic. Cronbach’s alpha quantifies the level of agreement on a standardized 0 to 1 scale. Higher values indicate higher agreement between items.

High Cronbach’s alpha values indicate that response values for each participant across a set of questions are consistent. For example, when participants give a high response for one of the items, they are also likely to provide high responses for the other items. This consistency indicates the measurements are reliable and the items might measure the same characteristic.

Conversely, low values indicate the set of items do not reliably measure the same construct. High responses for one question do not suggest that participants rated the other items highly. Consequently, the questions are unlikely to measure the same property because the measurements are unreliable.

For this statistic, data usually originate from survey responses, assessment instruments, and test scores. Data can be continuous but will often be Likert and binary values. The calculations assume that all items measure the same trait using the same scale. Statisticians call this a tau equivalent model.

Read on to learn more about using, interpreting, and calculating Cronbach’s alpha. I close with an example analysis.

What is Cronbach’s Alpha Used For?

Image of a list for systematic sampling.Analysts frequently use Cronbach’s alpha when designing and testing a new survey or assessment instrument. This statistic helps them evaluate the quality of the tool during the design phase before deploying it fully. It is a measure of reliability.

Surveys and assessment instruments frequently ask multiple questions about the same concept, characteristic, or construct. By including several items on the same aspect, the test can develop a more nuanced assessment of the phenomenon.

Analysts can combine multiple related items to form a scale for the construct. However, before including various questions in a scale, they must be sure that all items reliably measure the same construct. Cronbach’s alpha helps with that process.

Imagine researchers are developing a self-esteem scale and are developing multiple items to measure that construct. If all items actually assess self-esteem, then scores across items should generally agree, producing a high Cronbach’s alpha. For instance, individuals with high self-esteem will tend to score highly on all items. Conversely, individuals with low self-esteem will tend to score low on all items.

However, if not all items assess self-esteem, individuals can measure high on some questions and low on others. The scores across items disagree, producing a lower Cronbach’s alpha.

Typically, researchers use Cronbach’s alpha to ensure that items agree, but they need to use it with other analyses that evaluate whether the items measure the correct characteristic. More on that in the limitations section!

Cronbach’s Alpha Interpretation

Interpreting Cronbach’s alpha is a little more complex than higher is better. Let’s cover the highlights as well as some caveats and warnings.

Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0 to 1.

  • Zero indicates that there is no correlation between the items at all. They are entirely independent. Knowing the value of a response to one question provides no information about the responses to the other questions.
  • One indicates that they are perfectly correlated. Knowing the value of one response provides complete information about the other items.

Of course, your value will usually be somewhere in between. What is an acceptable range for Cronbach’s alpha?

Analysts frequently use 0.7 as a benchmark value for Cronbach’s alpha. At this level and higher, the items are sufficiently consistent to indicate the measure is reliable. Typically, values near 0.7 are minimally acceptable but not ideal. However, some fields and industries have different minimum values. Be sure to check for your study area.

It might surprise you, but Cronbach’s alpha can be too high. Extremely high values can indicate that the questions are redundant. For example, if respondents always give the same response to two items, you might be able to remove one of them. Again, different analysts/fields of study differ on what constitutes “too high.” Frequently, it’ll be either Cronbach’s alpha > 0.95 or 0.99.

Warnings and Limitations

Finally, here are several cautions about what Cronbach’s alpha does not tell you.

Cronbach’s alpha is a measure of reliability but not validity. It can indicate whether responses are consistent between items (reliability), but it cannot determine whether the items measure the correct concept (validity). For example, the responses to the questions can be very consistent, but they might measure positive outlook rather than self-esteem as you intended. Learn more about Reliability vs. Validity.

Furthermore, while high Cronbach’s values indicate consistency, they do not necessarily prove that your items are unidimensional, measuring a single characteristic. Items can measure multiple related concepts and, thereby, produce high alpha values.

In this light, you should see obtaining a high Cronbach’s alpha as a necessary step for establishing reliability, but it’s not sufficient by itself for determining validity. To help ensure that a set of items measures the correct characteristic, and only that characteristic, analysts frequently use factor analysis and principal components analysis.

Learn about more ways to Evaluate Validity.

How to Calculate Cronbach’s Alpha

Usually, you’ll have your statistical software calculate Cronbach’s alpha for you. However, knowing how to calculate it yourself can help you understand it.

Below is the formula for Cronbach’s alpha.

Formula for Cronbach's alpha.

Where:

  • N = number of items
  • c̅ = mean covariance between items.
  • v̅ = mean item variance.

The calculations for Cronbach’s alpha involve taking the average covariance and dividing it by the average total variance. Therefore, a high alpha value requires the covariance to be high relative to the item variance. In other words, the relationships between the questions account for most of the overall variability.

Additionally, the number of items is a factor. Cronbach’s alpha tends to increase as you add more items.

Analysis Example

Imagine a bank wants to survey customers to evaluate how satisfied they are with the timeliness of its service. You develop the following four survey questions:

  • Item 1 – My telephone, email, or letter inquiry was answered in a reasonable amount of time.
  • Item 2 – I am satisfied with the timeliness of the service provided.
  • Item 3 – The time I waited for services was reasonable.
  • Item 4 – I am satisfied with the services I received.

These questions all use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 Very Dissatisfied to 5 Very Satisfied. You ask 60 customers to take the survey during the pilot study phase before distributing the survey more widely. Download the CSV dataset: Cronbachs_alpha.

For this analysis, the statistical software calculates the overall Cronbach’s alpha. Then it recalculates the statistic after omitting each item because that process can provide valuable information about specific items. The statistical output is below.

Statistical output for Cronbach's alpha.

The overall Cronbach’s alpha is 0.7853. It’s minimally acceptable by most standards.

Let’s see if we can improve it some.

Under Omitted Item Statistics, the software recalculates Cronbach’s alpha after removing an item. If omitting an item substantially increases Cronbach’s alpha, consider removing that question from the instrument because it is suspect.

Removing Item 4 causes Cronbach’s alpha to increase from 0.7853 to 0.921674. This result suggests that only items 1, 2, and 3 measure customer service timeliness. We should either remove item 4 or reword and retest it.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Related

Filed Under: Basics Tagged With: analysis example, conceptual, interpreting results

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. A.wasay says

    January 16, 2023 at 3:29 am

    In above example how did you find total mean value? Could you please share the step by step calculation for alpha value. Thank you.

    Reply
  2. Prof Y says

    January 13, 2023 at 7:59 am

    Thank you. I haven’t used Chronbach’s alpha in years. My understanding was quite rusty. This quickly brought me back up to speed

    Reply
  3. RATNAVELL says

    December 3, 2022 at 7:43 am

    This article is very helpful for my quantitative assignment. Can I know when this article is written for my citation? Tq author.

    Reply
    • Jim Frost says

      December 3, 2022 at 5:02 pm

      Hi!

      When citing online resources, you typically use an “Accessed” date rather than a publication date because online content can change over time. For more information, read Purdue University’s Citing Electronic Resources.

      Reply

Comments and Questions Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Meet Jim

I’ll help you intuitively understand statistics by focusing on concepts and using plain English so you can concentrate on understanding your results.

Read More...

Buy My Introduction to Statistics Book!

Cover of my Introduction to Statistics: An Intuitive Guide ebook.

Buy My Hypothesis Testing Book!

Cover image of my Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide ebook.

Buy My Regression Book!

Cover for my ebook, Regression Analysis: An Intuitive Guide for Using and Interpreting Linear Models.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

    I won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Follow Me

    • FacebookFacebook
    • RSS FeedRSS Feed
    • TwitterTwitter

    Top Posts

    • How To Interpret R-squared in Regression Analysis
    • How to Interpret P-values and Coefficients in Regression Analysis
    • How to do t-Tests in Excel
    • Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis: Problems, Detection, and Solutions
    • Z-table
    • Mean, Median, and Mode: Measures of Central Tendency
    • How to Find the P value: Process and Calculations
    • How to Interpret the F-test of Overall Significance in Regression Analysis
    • Choosing the Correct Type of Regression Analysis
    • One-Tailed and Two-Tailed Hypothesis Tests Explained

    Recent Posts

    • Matched Pairs Design: Uses & Examples
    • Nonresponse Bias: Definition & Reducing
    • Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF): Uses, Graphs & vs PDF
    • Slope Intercept Form of Linear Equations: A Guide
    • Population vs Sample: Uses and Examples
    • How to Calculate a Percentage

    Recent Comments

    • Steve on Survivorship Bias: Definition, Examples & Avoiding
    • Jim Frost on Using Post Hoc Tests with ANOVA
    • Jim Frost on Statistical Significance: Definition & Meaning
    • Gary on Statistical Significance: Definition & Meaning
    • Gregory C. Alexander on Use Control Charts with Hypothesis Tests

    Copyright © 2023 · Jim Frost · Privacy Policy