What is a Prospective Study?
A prospective study is an experimental design that looks forward in time and observes events as they happen. Participants begin the study without having a condition of interest. Then researchers gather data and take measurements at regular intervals to identify the occurrence of specific outcomes along with other data that might relate to them.
For example, a prospective study might follow a group of participants and observe the onset of a disease over a certain period. The study focuses on identifying factors that increase or decrease disease occurrences. At the start of the study, none of the subjects have the disease of interest.
Statisticians generally consider prospective studies to be superior to retrospective studies because they are less susceptible to bias and confounding. In a prospective study, the researchers specifically choose the methodology, variables, measurement procedures, equipment, personnel, and participants that can effectively answer their research question rather than relying on whatever subjects and their data that happen to be in available records.
For instance, in a prospective study, researchers can ensure that they conduct measurements and interventions in controlled, consistent conditions. They can also minimize potential confounders and biases by accounting for them in their experimental design. By selecting its participants rather than depending on available records, a prospective study reduces the risk of selection bias, which occurs when the participants don’t reflect the larger population.
Additionally, only a prospective study can estimate the population frequency of the outcome and find the relative risk for an exposure.
Researchers commonly use these studies in epidemiology, medicine, and public health.
Prospective Study Designs
Prospective studies employ diverse methodologies. Although these methods vary in specifics, they typically track subjects over time to see if they develop a particular condition based on specific variables, risk factors, and interventions.
These studies are in contrast to retrospective studies that look back in time to assess events that have already occurred.
Learn more about Experimental Designs.
Prospective Cohort Studies
In prospective cohort studies, researchers gather data over time to contrast the emergence of the desired outcome between individuals exposed to a risk factor and those who weren’t. This design helps determine a potential association between the risk factor and the outcome. These are longitudinal studies. Learn more about Longitudinal Studies: Overview, Examples & Benefits.
Prospective cohort studies are observational because researchers do not control factors that can affect the outcome. Consequently, this type of prospective study experiences the confounding and bias typical of observational studies. Like other prospective studies, all participants in a forward-looking cohort study begin without the condition of interest. Learn more about Observational Studies.
For example, the Framingham Heart Study is a notable prospective cohort study that gathered a group of healthy participants, none of whom had heart disease at the beginning of the study. Over an extended period, the researchers monitored their dietary habits, cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and other relevant health indicators. As the years progressed, they tracked the development of heart disease in these participants. After several decades, the findings revealed that those with lower cholesterol levels and controlled blood pressure had a significantly reduced risk of developing heart disease compared to those with less controlled health markers.
Learn more about Cohort Studies.
Randomized Controlled Trials
Another common prospective study design is the randomized controlled trial, in which researchers randomly assign participants to different treatment groups, and the study follows them over time to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard in clinical research due to their robust design. By randomly assigning participants to intervention and control groups, RCTs inherently control for known and unknown confounding variables, ensuring that any observed effects are likely due to the intervention itself and not other external factors. This randomization minimizes selection bias, as participants have an equal chance of being in any given group.
For example, in a clinical trial of a new drug for hypertension, researchers randomly assign participants to receive the drug or a placebo, and the study follow thems over time to determine if the medication affects blood pressure.
Advantages of a Prospective Study
A prospective study tends to have the following advantages compared to retrospective designs:
- Chooses the methodology, measurement procedures, and subjects that can most effectively answer the research question and minimize bias.
- Controls conditions and standardizes procedures to produce better data.
- Can choose to measure control variables to reduce confounding.
- Can estimate population prevalence of outcomes and relative risk.
- Minimizes recall bias by not relying on subjects’ memories.
Disadvantages of a Prospective Study
Unfortunately, they tend to have the following disadvantages.
- Time-Consuming: They often require extended periods to observe outcomes, which can take years or even decades.
- Expensive: Due to their duration, need for regular follow-ups, controlled environments, and specialized personnel and equipment, these studies can be costly.
- Loss of Participants: Participants can drop out over time, potentially introducing bias.
- Requires Prevalent Outcomes: If the outcome is rare, a prospective study might observe an insufficient number of the outcomes to produce usable results.