• Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Store
  • Glossary
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Statistics By Jim

Making statistics intuitive

  • Graphs
  • Basics
  • Hypothesis Testing
  • Regression
  • ANOVA
  • Probability
  • Time Series
  • Fun

Matched Pairs Design: Uses & Examples

By Jim Frost Leave a Comment

What is a Matched Pairs Design?

A matched pairs design is an experimental design where researchers match pairs of participants by relevant characteristics. Then the researchers randomly assign one person from each pair to the treatment group and the other to the control group. This type of experiment is also known as a matching pairs design.

Photograph of twin babies to represent a matched pairs design.
Now that’s matching!

Statisticians recommend using this design to control for potential confounders that would otherwise bias the study’s results. The matched pairs experimental design is particularly advantageous for studies with limited sample sizes. When sample sizes are small, it can be challenging to achieve well-balanced groups through random assignment alone.

To conduct this type of experiment, researchers must identify the characteristics they’ll use to match the participants. Typically, these attributes include the potential confounders along with other relevant qualities such as age, gender, and race. Matching factors can incorporate medical history, lifestyle habits, and baseline measurements of the outcome of interest.

After identifying the criteria for the matched pairs design, researchers select pairs of participants with similar characteristics. Then they split each pair between the two experimental groups. For example, if a pair of participants match on the relevant variables, the researchers randomly assign one to the treatment group and the other to the control group.

This process creates two similar experimental groups. The goal is to reduce variability between groups relative to a typical between-subjects study.

Learn more about Experimental Designs, Random Assignment, and Control Groups.

Example

Suppose a study evaluates the effectiveness of a new drug for treating hypertension. The researchers match participants on their age, gender, BMI, and baseline blood pressure and then randomly assign the members of each pair to receive the drug or a placebo.

This matched pairs design ensures that the treatment and control groups have similar characteristics at the beginning of the study. Notably, the process explicitly equalizes the factors the researchers know to affect hypertension. Consequently, if the mean blood pressures of the treatment and control groups differ at the end of the study, the researchers can confidently state that the drug caused the difference.

Advantages of a Matched Pairs Design

Helps Researchers Draw Causal Conclusions

A matched pairs design helps researchers draw causal inferences by controlling for confounding variables. It helps ensure that the experimental groups are equivalent before the experiment. Hence, the experimental treatment likely caused the differences the researchers observed afterward.

Learn more about Confounding Variables and how they can bias the results.

Increases Statistical Power and Precision

Another advantage of this experimental design is that it helps increase the precision and statistical power of the study. By matching participants, the experimental design reduces the variability between groups, making it easier to detect a significant difference between them. This condition increases a hypothesis test’s ability to find an effect when it exists and produces a more precise estimate of the effect.

Learn more about Statistical Power and How Confidence Intervals Assess Precision.

Disadvantages of a Matched Pairs Design

2X Dropouts

With a matched pairs design, if one subject drops out of the study, the study must drop the other member of the pair. In other words, one dropout causes the study to lose two participants!

Matching Can Be Difficult

Researchers might find it challenging and time-consuming to find participants who match on all the characteristics. As the number of variables increases, the challenge of matching subjects for all of them also increases. This difficulty can increase the cost and logistical challenges of the study and limit the sample size.

Might Not Control All Confounders

This disadvantage is an extension of the previous one. If the outcome of interest is complex and involves many factors, a matched pairs design might not be able to match participants on all of them. When a design does not control a confounder, it can bias the results, making them untrustworthy.

In this case, researchers can use random assignment with a sufficiently large sample size. This approach requires larger samples, but it tends to produce equivalent experimental groups without requiring researchers to match subjects.

Despite these limitations, a matched pairs design is a valuable tool for conducting experiments. By carefully selecting and matching participants, researchers can use smaller sample sizes while increasing the statistical power of their study and obtain more precise estimates of the treatment effect.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Related

Filed Under: Basics Tagged With: experimental design

Reader Interactions

Comments and Questions Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Meet Jim

I’ll help you intuitively understand statistics by focusing on concepts and using plain English so you can concentrate on understanding your results.

Read More...

Buy My Introduction to Statistics Book!

Cover of my Introduction to Statistics: An Intuitive Guide ebook.

Buy My Hypothesis Testing Book!

Cover image of my Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide ebook.

Buy My Regression Book!

Cover for my ebook, Regression Analysis: An Intuitive Guide for Using and Interpreting Linear Models.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

    I won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Follow Me

    • FacebookFacebook
    • RSS FeedRSS Feed
    • TwitterTwitter

    Top Posts

    • How to Interpret P-values and Coefficients in Regression Analysis
    • How To Interpret R-squared in Regression Analysis
    • Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis: Problems, Detection, and Solutions
    • How to do t-Tests in Excel
    • How to Interpret the F-test of Overall Significance in Regression Analysis
    • Z-table
    • How to Find the P value: Process and Calculations
    • Mean, Median, and Mode: Measures of Central Tendency
    • Understanding Interaction Effects in Statistics
    • F-table

    Recent Posts

    • Sampling Frame: Definition & Examples
    • Probability Mass Function: Definition, Uses & Example
    • Using Scientific Notation
    • Selection Bias: Definition & Examples
    • ANCOVA: Uses, Assumptions & Example
    • Fibonacci Sequence: Formula & Uses

    Recent Comments

    • Morris on Validity in Research and Psychology: Types & Examples
    • Jim Frost on What are Robust Statistics?
    • Allan Fraser on What are Robust Statistics?
    • Steve on Survivorship Bias: Definition, Examples & Avoiding
    • Jim Frost on Using Post Hoc Tests with ANOVA

    Copyright © 2023 · Jim Frost · Privacy Policy